Glendenning
Lucas
Morita
Raffi
Richer
Schwarz
Scott
Shepherd
Viallefond
Draft Minutes
Subsystem Scientist Activities (all)
Chris Wilson -- Pipeline I spent 40 hours over 2.5 weeks participating in the Phase II testing of
the AIPS++ IRAM re-use test. I was able to calibrate my data set
(CO 2-1 and CO 1-0 data of UCam, given to me by Robert Lucas)
successfully as far as I know. I had some difficulties in producing final
images. I was able to clean the data, but only using the full inner
quarter of each plane rather than using a clean box. This resulted in
some rather strange negative residuals. I ran out of time to try to
figure out why clean wasn't accepting my mask for the clean boxes and
also therefore could not compare my image to those from the CLIC
reduction Robert had done.
John Richer -- Telescope Calibration My activity report this month is - nothing.
Trying to find time to read
the 1400 pages of PDR documentation!
Steve Scott -- Correlator
A few small exchanges with Jim Pisano on channel average data and on data
blanking.
Leonardo Testi -- Observing Program Preparation
This month I had a fruitful meeting in Edimburgh with Alan Bridger (and with a
good fraction of the OT team via telecon):
we discussed several existing implementations of correlator setup tools,
the simlite requirements draft, and I had a demonstration of the OT prototype
and of one of the associated packages (JSky), that is planned to be enhanced
and integrated in the OT for the ALMA needs. I also discussed with the team the
implementation of the ETC (which will not be part of SimLite).
I also participated in the AIPS++ IRAM-test Phase II.
Mel Wright -- Scheduling On the scheduling subsystem I've looked at the latest
design document again, and talked with Allen to clarify
some points.
Francois Viallefond -- Archive none so far
Jeff Mangum -- Control Same report as last time...consumed by ATF issues.
Peter Schilke -- Data Reduction User Interface See latest version of the DRUI requirements, with minor
changes, basically taking Debra's comments into account. Tim was
concerned that the new developments of AIPS++ would have an impact on
the DRUI discussion. I think as far as requirements go, there is no
change, while of course the implementation of the requirements would be
much easier.
Debra Shepherd -- Off-Line Analysis Participated in the ALMA phase II testing of a Plateau de Bure mosaic
of a protostellar CO(1-0) outflow and the YSO continuum emission.
Successfully reduced and imaged both line and continuum emission.
Identified several problems during the imaging process that will need
to be addressed in order to efficiently deconvolve millimeter images.
All problems identified during during the testing are listed at http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~dshepher/alma/
(Informal) news from AIPS++ Technical review (G. Raffi)
We had an informal oral summary of the AIPS++ Technical
review. An executive summary is expected to be made available
soon (and at the PDR).
Sim Lite (L. Testi, F. Viallefond)
Requirements will be modified after RL's comments and will be
available soon.
AIPS++/IRAM test (R. Lucas)
Phase II actually started at end of January 2003 (Garching
week), and was finished March 3rd. Data sets selected were
mostly single-field Plateau de Bure projects, plus one mosaic
project, giving a fair coverage of instrument capabilities.
Testers have been: J. Pety, A. Baker, A. Coulais, F. Gueth,
D. Shepherd, L. Testi, C. Wilson. All have experience with
millimeter-wave radioastronomy (6 observers, one
developer). Four have experience with Plateau de Bure data,
three no. All followed the tutorial in Garching. Each tester
had about month for installation and data reduction. Actual
testing effort was 6 FTE-weeks. The support from AIPS++ was 6
FTE-weeks.
All testers succeeded in calibrating the data, and obtained good
calibration solutions (with two minor
exceptions). Surprisingly many testers did not
succeed in obtaining believable images. Checking that the
calibration was correct would be desirable then.
Users found that the tutorial and cookbook are good and were
absolutely needed.
Some deficiencies were found in
spectral-line imaging; also lack of uv fit tool.
Recommendations are made to the Aips++ project, among which:
Graphic tools such as msplot are too slow.
Make AIPS++ more robust against user input errors; error
messages should be more uniformly presented to the
user.
Testing like this should be repeated at regular
intervals with appropriate groups. A test suite should
be developed also for automatic testing.
Need of intuitive interfaces, intelligent GUIs
(sensible defaults based on data properties).
All GUIs (e.g. viewer) should have and associated
script description (for automatic repeat).
More astronomer involvement, in definition, testing and
feedback; but also in software development.
Meta Data (R. Lucas)
The draft did not raise many of comments from the group
(comments still welcome). It was distributed as is to the PDR
panel, and will be discussed at the Software Workers
meeting. International units should be used for all quantities.
Date of next phone meeting
According to the schedule the following one will be on:
2003, April 09th 15:00 UTSummer time in EU and NA
$Id: 2003-03-12.html,v 1.4 2003/03/14 13:41:28 lucas Exp lucas $